Confederate Society
By Al Benson Jr.

According to “Barack Obama’s G8 Speech ‘An Alarming Call For An End to Catholic Education’.” The author of the article wrote: “At least he was smart enough to test the waters on foreign soil before introducing this particular facet of his agenda in the United States.”
Obama spoke in Belfast, Northern Ireland and lamented the “divisions” caused by Catholic and Protestant schools and how “we can’t see ourselves in one another” if we have separate religious schools.
Although he gave this speech in Ireland you have to know that his comments are really pointed at this country. He sees religious schools as an “impediment” to “world peace” and I am sure his One World solution for this impediment would be to eliminate all Christian Education in this country if he could get by with it and make sure that no American children had access to any education except what they can receive in “common core” public brain laundries. If religious schools are so bad why has he not also commented on Muslim schools and the divisive influence they might have in the community? You know the answer to that as well as I do—in Obama’s convoluted thinking it’s those nasty Christian schools, Catholic or Protestant, that are really the source of all the country’s divisions, while Muslim schools, with their promotion of Sharia law will “bring us all together.”
Most Christians have sat it out while this Marxist administration has attacked veterans, home schoolers, Tea Party members and various other groups this administration assures us are just filled with “low-level terrorists.” Recent revelations of gross misconduct on the part of the IRS and the NSA have been mostly met with yawns and comments about “the Lord’s in control so I don’t gotta do anything” from lazy Christians who just don’t want to be bothered to get up off their spiritual beds of ease to resist tyranny.
One wonders what the Christian reaction will be when Comrade Obama is finally given the go-ahead by his CFR/Trilateral handlers to start to put pressure on Christian schools to either begin to follow the party line or suffer the repercussions. Will most public school-oriented Christians feel it just doesn’t make any difference and will therefore do nothing as they have for generations?
I am a Reformed Protestant and so, naturally, I am in support of Christian schools that take that approach and promote that worldview. That doesn’t mean that I feel Catholic schools should be put out of business. I think all Christian denominations should make a serious effort to have their own schools and to promote Christian education—which I feel is the only genuine education there is anyway. I can see that statement ticking lots of folks off. How narrow minded, how provincial, right? Sorry, I disagree. The Scripture mandates that we bring our children up “in the nurture and admonition of the Lord” and you can’t do that by turning your kids over to the local public brain laundry for prime time five days every week.
So Obama will seek to begin to subtly call for an end to private Christian education because it is “divisive.” His Marxist agenda is divisive too but I notice he has no plans to end that. He will go after the Catholics now because he teels most Protestants will not stick up for them. If he manages to put a major dent in Catholic education he will go after the Protestants. Either way, he wants Christian education gone—there is potential opposition there that he’d like to do away with if he can.
Christian education needs to be upheld and supported, not done away with, leaving little Johnny or Mary with nothing but the public school alternative, which educationally, is no alternative at all. I am sure this is what he and his bosses want and his friends in the teachers unions will laugh all the way to the bank!
Any efforts to shut down or to minimize Christian education should be opposed and exposed and Mr. Obama should be informed that it is none of his business how we educate our kids. Due to his Marxist mentality it won’t make any difference to him, but he needs to know that the Christians will oppose his efforts because they fly in the face of Scripture. It’s for the children”—Right? Wrong!


BY:Joan Hough

     Article 6, U.S. Constitution:  “The Senators and Representatives before mentioned and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any office of public Trust under the United States. 

     To fulfill the Constitutional requirements contained in Article 6, the first U.S. Congress accepted the following words as their oath:

      “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support the Constitution of the United States.


     Almost a century later, in 1860, the members of the U.S. Congress added words to that original oath--words that directly referred to “an enemy within”:

      “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God. “

     Obviously there was an awakening in America to danger possibility or probability from persons and organizations “within” the nation.  This awareness resulted in the words “defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign AND DOMESTIC.”

     Some might contend that the “enemies within” statement had reference to the U.S. enemies who were destined to be tortured, burned out, mutilated and killed—those Southerners--Confederates who asked “only to be left alone,” who did not start a war by invading any other nation and had absolutely no desire to take over the U.S. government in a “real” Civil War.

      The problem with the “blame it on the South” contention was the Confederacy had yet to be born at the time of the creation of the second oath.  That oath was created a year before Lincoln’s election and his invasion of the Confederate nation and was based on the nation’s first oath.  To further disprove the possibility that Southerners were feared as the expected enemies, it should be noted that Southerners themselves voted in Congress at the very time the Oath was accepted and it is does not appear that they were against it.

     So if not Southerners as enemies, then why those words? 

     In order to understand the reason for the importance of the word “domestic,” let us look back further than the Communist (Marxist) controlled U.S. 1860s –back to the late 1700s, the time of George Washington.  It was then that a large number of Americans became concerned about a possible takeover of America--thought by some to involve the Illuminati working through American Masons. 

     It may be, as claimed by some serious students of American history, that in the Masons the highest of the high collection of their American leaders in the past had ties with those Old World Masons originally, directly under the control of the Old World Illuminati.  The Illuminati was known to be a group of intellectuals determined to rule the world--to destroy all religion, all family cohesiveness and put the people of the entire world under the global control of the Illuminati and of those who followed in the Illuminati footsteps, accepted their beliefs and gave the order complete allegiance. The atheistic Illuminati planned for a global takeover of all nations and the creation of (surprise!) a New World Order.  (Does that sound somewhat familiar?) 

      It is highly unlikely that the ordinary rank and file of American Masons ever had any knowledge of such ties, yet certainly if American organizations have been infiltrated by persons determined to enlist aid in overthrowing our Republic the infiltrators would have been foolish to ignore such an important, influential body of Masonic American males. To believe the enemies within left the Masons untouched is to totally underestimate the strategic skills of a major enemy of freedom.

      Had there existed a possibility that any American group would be ignored by an “enemy within,” surely the Oath taken by U.S. Congressmen, the U.S.A. President, and the members of the armed forces would have been worded differently—it would have made no reference to “enemies with.”  There would have been no oath to “defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign AND DOMESTIC.”

     When one becomes familiar with the workings of the Illuminati in the Old World, it becomes obvious that men with such beliefs and practices were not only attempting to get a foothold on our nation during George Washington’s day and through the1800s, but their words and efforts are still ringing through the air throughout our nation and the entire world today.

     Steven Montgomery in his article “The Illuminati: Cutting through the Gordian Know of ignorance and Disinformation “reveals long hidden secrets:

George Washington and John Adams directly felt the influence of the Illuminati upon early America as early as 1793.

“ In that year the French Ambassador to the United States, a man named Edmond-Charles Genet, otherwise known as Citizen Genet, arrived and began seditious activities. Genet was the embodiment of the Bavarian Illuminati transplanted to the United States, and the actions of Genet and so-called “democratic clubs” severely threatened the newly born United States. The Illuminati had been key players in the French Revolution and they appeared to be hard at work in the states.”

“Washington wrote that the subversive Jacobin clubs introduced by Citizen Genet “would shake the government to its foundations.” As great a man as Thomas Jefferson was, it seems he never understood the impact or influence of this secret combination upon America. Jefferson even writing after Barruel's book came out that it was the “ravings of a Bedlamite.”

 “John Adams wrote Jefferson years later and remarked, in a letter dated June 30, 1813, ‘You certainly never felt the terrorism excited by Genet, in 1793 . . . when ten thousand people in the streets of Philadelphia, day after day threatened to drag Washington out of his house, and effect a revolution . . . nothing but a [miracle] . . . could “have saved the United States from a fatal revolution of government.’”

“John Quincy Adams, probably the best educated and best prepared U.S. President, also said, in referring to these “democratic clubs” setup by Genet that they were “so perfectly affiliated with the Parisian Jacobins that their origin from a common parent cannot possibly be mistaken. “

      George Washington was a New World Mason—and it is doubtful there could be anyone who exemplifies the goodness of Americanism more than he does.  With Washington’s acumen, it is not surprising that he was an American who recognized the presence of an “enemy within” and said in a letter to George Washington Snyer, September 25, 1798:  “I have heard much of the nefarious, and dangerous plan, and doctrines of the Illuminati.””-illuminati/

     Washington wrote to Snyer again on October 24, 1798:

      “It was not my intention to doubt that, the Doctrines of the Illuminati, and principles of Jacobinism had not spread in the United States.  On the contrary, no one is more truly satisfied of this fact that I am.

     The idea that I meant to convey, was, that I did not believe that the Lodges of Free masons in this country had, as Societies, endeavored to propagate the diabolical tenets of the first, or pernicious principles of the latter (if they are susceptible of separation).  That individuals of them may have done it, or that the founder, or instrument employed to found the Democratic Societies in the United States, may have had these objects; and actually had a separation of the People from their Government in view, is too evident to be questioned. “

      “Essentially what he [Washington] is saying is that he does not doubt that the doctrines of the Bavarian Illuminati, as created by Adam Weishaupt in 1776, (which was used to infiltrate Freemasonry) had spread in the United States.  in fact he [Washington] says, “On the contrary, no one is more truly satisfied of this fact than I am.”  Then he adds that it is possible that those Democratic Societies influenced or created by the Freemasons or Illuminati, “…actually had a separation of the People from their Government in view, is too evident to be questioned.’”

     One of our land’s highly recognized scholars, a man who is the current historian for the Library of Congress and is noted for his Liberalism wrote a book in 1980 that should be read by anyone concerned about the future fate of the USA. The book is entitled Fire in the Minds of Men, Origins of the Revolutionary Faith.  Its author is James H. Billington. According to historian, Steven Montgomery in his online article “The Illuminati:  Cutting Through the Gordian Know of Ignorance and Disinformation,” Billington’s work supports the findings of John Robison’s book, Proofs of a Conspiracy Against All the Religions and Governments of Europe Carried on In the Secret Meetings of Freemasons, Illuminati, and Reading Societies (1797)

     Montgomery reports: “Billington [in his 1980 text] notes in extensive detail the ideological and conspiratorial roots of modern day Marxists and revolutionary movements.  This is an important work to study in order to comprehend more fully what is behind those current social, political, and cultural activists who seek to undermine our western cultural heritage. “

     Billington documents the truth that modern day Communism developed from two branches of the Illuminati: The Sublime maîtres Parfaits and the Society of the Seasons. Frederick Engels offers independent verification of this truth in his article “On the History of the Communist League.”

     According to Montgomery’s findings, “Timothy Dwight, President of Yale University, also warned of the danger and influence of the Illuminati in a political sermon given on July 4th, 1798 entitled, “The Duty of Americans, at the Present Crisis.” Harvard President Joseph Willard, a while after warned of the danger writing that the Illuminati was “secretly striving to undermine all our ancient institutions, civil and sacred.’”

     American churchmen awakened to the danger posed by the Illuminati.  Pastor Jedediah Morse warned:

 “Practically all of the civil and ecclesiastical establishments of Europe have already been shaken to their foundations by this terrible organization: the French Revolution itself is doubtless to be traced to its machinations; the successes of the French armies are to be explained on the same ground.  The Jacobins are nothing more nor less than the open manifestation of the hidden system of the Illuminati.  The Order has its branches established and its emissaries at work in America.  The affiliated Jacobin Societies in America have doubtless had as the object of their establishment the propagation of the principles of the Illuminated mother club in France. . . I hold it as a duty, my brethren, which I owe to God, to the cause of religion, to my country and to you, at this time to declare to you, thus honestly and faithfully, these truths.  My only aim is to awaken you and myself a due attention, at the alarming period, to our dearest interests.  As a faithful watchman I would give you the warning of present danger.”


The Enemy Within

Part II.


Joan Hough

      The Illuminati is said to still be on the scene in our present time for there
 has recently surfaced information from a Texan, a female self-described former
member. She reports that there exists in the United States and in Europe a present day
Illuminati group with the same goals as the original bunch—that this group is working, just as did the original one, for the takeover of the U.S. government, total destruction of religion, and the elimination of the family unit and marriage.
All the work of the Illuminati is for the purpose of furthering the establishment of Global control in a New World Order.

       This modern Illuminati group is reported to have strong European ties and to be continuing the work begun in the 1860s in America.  They are dedicated to push, to propagandize and encourage young Americans to accept and practice
homosexuality.  Pedophilia, animal sacrifices and ritual murders are practices of the Illuminati members.

       We are further advised that the present day Illuminati group is an organization with entangling ties with the CIA, that the Illuminati group consists of the richest and most powerful people in the world; that it controls the world traffic in drugs,
guns, pornography and prostitution and is behind terrorism and assassinations.—that Communism and the United Nations are merely its tools.  The top officials in the group live in Russia and China.


     Undoubtedly little written here is new to many readers; some Americans have long been aware that every organization, unless extreme care is developed and maintained on a long-term basis, is easily taken over by folks with evil on their minds.  The truth is known that in some instances new groups are created with the same name, such as is the case with the KKK, an organization with motives unrelated to those of the original group. Deceit is ever the practice of human beings with evil in their minds and hearts.

     Southern Masons, learning of the behavior of Sherman’s “boys, ” were appalled that only a very few of the enemy Masons honored the Masonic hand signals for protection from torture, home invasions and burnings.  This failure caused some Southerners to either conclude that few Masons participated in that unconstitutional invasion or that Masons in the north had experienced some sort of psychological cataclysm.

     The failure of northern Masons to offer protection was certainly as appalling to Southern Masons, as was the treatment of Catholics witnessed by Southern Catholics-- the attacks made on priests, nuns, and even involving the burning of Catholic churches and at least one big Catholic Convent.  Despite repeated Catholics’ appeals, all of the anti-Catholic horrors remained unhalted by the responsible U.S. “Catholic” General, a megalomaniacal conscienceless arsonist, by name of William Tecumseh Sherman. Under the directions of General Sheridan similar behaviors occurred throughout the Eastern Confederate states, and in Missouri by General Fremont and a number of his fellow Socialist/Communist Union Generals.

      The genocidal horrors of Sherman were, perhaps, especially shocking to the South’s Catholics--that a man reared as a Catholic could bask in such absolute evil would have been unbelievable had his behaviors not been witnessed by many.  Sherman’s  “boys,” according to lying, usually brainwashed/indoctrinated historians, included not a one who was brought to America right out of some jail in Germany.  They were, instead, all good “God-fearing” lads incapable of burning, raping, torturing or murdering innocents—and were just as good as the Southerners.  Confederates knew better than this and their own testimony and records and that found in letters of some Union soldiers, proves Southern reports were valid and reliable.

     There should be no doubt in anyone’s mind that the Illuminati was the organization which was the Mama of Communism and Marxism, The Illuminati hired Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels to write their "Bible," THE COMMUNIST MANIFESTO.  Once the Manifesto was written the Illuminati bunch dropped “Illuminati” as its title.  They declared themselves to be “Communists”—and their philosophy to be “Communism.”  There is an almost overwhelming amount of evidence of this if anyone actually cares to investigate true World History and the roots of the present chaos in America.

     It seems the more educated one becomes, the denser is the brainwash received,. Most “professional historians,” with rare exception, such as Dr. Clyde N. Wilson, can do little other than accept as truth the Communist lies. It is therefore not surprising that American intellectuals have not seen Communism as the most important of all reasons for the crushing of Southern Christians during the War of Northern Aggression and the building of a totalitarian government.

       All members of the Republican Party have promulgated Marxist lies as the original ideas/ products of so-called “good Republicans” for over 100 years.  Republicans have, eventually, begun to move hand in hand with Democrats. All necessary to prove this is to read the Marxist “Ten Commandments” (its springboard to World Control) found in their bible, The Communist Manifesto. In this work Communists advocate the destruction of marriage, the destruction of the family unit, the elimination of religion, and the establishment of what seems to be sex on demand, with no responsibility by males, and the creation of a Central Bank.

     The Marxist Communists were the originators of the establishment of America’s Income Tax, (never existing in America until Lincoln’s and the Marxist “Radical Republicans” rule).  Marxists demanded control by the all-powerful central government of the minds of all American children (via public education),  stealing all properties from Rebels—and a host of other “must haves” that were all actually incorporated in U.S. laws—some, even as Constitutional amendments. 

      During the fifties, according to a speech given by Thomas J. DiLorenzo, the Marxists revved up their anti-Confederate propaganda to support so called Civil Rights movement and other efforts involved in the Socialism-Communism plans for America. It can be said that Marxist creative fabrications have, skillfully and diligently been washed into the developing brains of all American school children for at least a century and a half.  (As the twig is bent, so votes the Socialist!)

      The brainwashed cannot help but believe: there is NO NEW WORLD ORDER (NWO) and no NWO plan.  They believe that the entire family of Bush males, including Senator Prescott Bush could not be involved in such a “fantastical” situation-- that Obama’s grandparents were not neck deep in it, and neither were his mama and his papa (whomever Papa might have been).  They accept, unquestioningly, that American presidents have not had the approval of and been controlled by the New World Order folks embedded in the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), the Trilateral’s, the Bilderberg Group and the International Bankers. In fact they doubt the very existence of the four groups now known by some as the “Unholy Foursome.”   According to the swallowed propaganda—anyone believing otherwise is simply a dupe of silly conspiracy theorists.

     Brainwashed Americans cannot believe that H.W. “Pappy” BUSH, Henry Kissinger, Alger Hiss, Franklin Roosevelt, Lyndon B. Johnson, Obama, etc., etc., have had any knowledge of or taken any action to bring to fruition the Illuminati-Communist dream of a NEW WORLD ORDER.  That these leaders had no connection with any group planning to absorb our nation, eliminate our sovereignty and our borders, fill our lands with ignorant, malleable third “worlders,” complete the Transatlantic Corridor from Mexico to Canada.

     It has become begun, however, to be evident to an increasing number of Americans that our leaders wish to us into the NORTH AMERICAN UNION in preparation for our placement in the new global government with the European Union, and the adoption of a new form of money.  The new “union” will be controlled by Russia and China; the United States would not place at the top in the global arrangement. But by then our land will be overflowing with placid, third world natives who do not care.  The white, genetic or ideological descendants of the founding fathers will be inconsequential in number or power and most of them are likely to be too dumbed down to think.

      Pappy Bush did, after becoming President, tell all Americans of his great joy that “the New World Order” had finally arrived.  F.D. Roosevelt did give away most of Europe to his bosom buddy, Communist Stalin and did approve the efforts of American traitor-Communist Alger Hiss to create the United Nations, an organization so very pleasing to the Russian Communists.   Do you remember that? (Remember how the intellectuals all denied that Hiss was a Communist—and only recently has the truth that Hiss was a big Communist traitor been absolutely and completely verified.)    Lyndon Johnson did hide the truth, did lie about Israel’s murders of American sailors.  Foreign Jews did deliberately attack Americans—foreigners did-- to whom we still give millions.  Have you learned that truth?  

      Brainwashed Americans are unaware that the United Nations, a handmaiden of the NWO, is but a means to the Commie New World Order dream’s end.  And as every good Communist knows, “THE END JUSTIFIES THE MEANS,” so it matters not to America’s enemy within what horrors—what holocausts (as forced on the Confederates) what genocide, what tortures (as forced on the Confederates) and what murders, as were committed then and since are by the U.S. government. (Killing American citizens without due process is murder.)

     The role that is presently played in the New World Order by the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency should interest all Americans still capable of even a small degree of independent thinking.

      Many Americans are expressing doubts now about much of the propaganda delivered by the U.S. government and the controlled media. Despite the concerted efforts of government sycophants, ordinary Americans suspect that the U.S. government officials regularly and routinely promulgate lies.  The increase of doubts is bringing forth an avalanche of new governmental propaganda.  Even old conspiracies are being white washed again by government faithful determined, for example, to sell the Lyndon B. Johnson’s single bullet theory.   The latest new video supposedly PROVES only one bullet was shot and that Oswald and only Oswald did it. 

     To the horror of people in high places, large numbers of ordinary Americans are beginning to shake off much of the government-administered brainwash and to question the Bushy CIA connections to the death of JFK and the CIA’s relationship with the United Nations.  Suspicions have been ignited concerning the Bay of Pigs’ Action, the plane which supposedly hit the Pentagon, 911, the Israeli’s supposedly “accidental” murder and/or mutilation of sailors on the USS Liberty Ship, the orders given to the U.S. military to NOT READ any criticism of Obama,.  (Censoring has already begun. Will books be banned next?) And what about the anti-Obama songs, will even those tunes soon be prohibited?  Does this not remind you of Scotland when the British killed folks for playing the bagpipes and for wearing even a wee-tiny fragment of tartan hidden under their clothes?  Are you aware that Confederate women were sent to far off prisons by maniacal U.S. generals  (think Beast Butler) when the ladies uttered not a word but wore little red and white ribbons?

      Ordinary Americans have begun declaring that there has been a deliberate plan on the part of Republicans and Democrats to leave the U.S. borders wide open and to give legal status to probably twenty million illegals (not the officially declared ten million).  Rank and file Americans have also begun to realize that there has been deliberate indoctrinations and mind alterations of American school children.  Children are being brainwashed to accept perversions as natural and desirable.

      The Republicans’  “No Child Left Behind” is now seen as one of the more obvious of the educational bits of stupidities fostered on an unsuspecting public. And now the way is paved by the Democrats so that little boy Americans can be correctly manipulated so that instead of military uniforms and guns, male adults will indulge in lacy drawers, dresses and ribbons. The USA can even opt to save itself from aggressively protective sovereign actions of American males by employing hormonal treatments of little boys who insist on playing cowboys and Indians or to play with GI Joe dolls and toy soldiers instead of baby dolls that wee-wee.  Passive Americans are required for the NWO purpose.

     It is sadly true that there remain plenty—too many—old fashioned, freedom loving Americans who lack sufficient understanding of human nature, of conspiracy, and of evil to help save our nation from falling in that same avalanche the Roman Empire went through.  Because of their own innate goodness, their innocence, their naivety, their gullibility, these American cannot believe in the existence of the great evil now taking over the United States.  They are incapable of comprehending the truth that evil exists—that it lurks in the hearts, the brains, and the actions of men and women we have been deceived to respect as fine Christians, fine Jews, and fine Americans. Too many Americans still fail to comprehend the verity-- that power corrupts and has corrupted absolutely in the case of every member of the New World Order gang.

      You want to know who the enemy within is?  They are.

After the Obamas, it is believed by the puppeteers, that Americans will, with enormous gratitude, welcome a clean looking, educated, mannerly Bush former Florida governor,  with a nice Latino wife, and wonderfully (seemingly) pro-American parents and grandparents. So now America’s Unholy Foursome- (the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral’ s, the Bilderberg group, and the International Bankers) want to continue the Bush dynasty by fostering on Americans another Bush as the third Bushy tailed President.  

     Will most Americans ever realize that the Bushy dynasty has been every bit as evil, every bit as revolting as Obama’s regal, dictatorial, holiday traveling leadership?  Will the anti-Illuminati Americans be able to convince the new immigrants to America of the evils of Nepotism and Communism?

      Will knowledgeable Americans be able to halt the gigantic step forward being taken by the New World Order? Will ordinary, low on the totem pole Republicans ever open their eyes to the birds of the same feather relationship the Republican Party has had for years with the Democratic one?    Will these ordinary Republicans cease singling out only Obama and the Democratic Party members as the enemies of liberty?  Will they remain ignorant of the truth that Obama (if that’s his name) is but one of the spokes in the new World Order’s wheel—that significantly more important is the Bushy Unholy Foursome’s hub filled with Illuminati rising above their old designated term of Communism?

Editor's  Note: The following article is used with permission from Dr. DiLorenzo

by: Professor Thomas DiLorenzo

After writing two books and dozens of articles, and giving hundreds of radio and television interviews and public presentations on the subject of Lincoln and the political economy of the American "Civil War” over the past fifteen years, I have realized that the only thing the average American knows about the subject is a few slogans that we are all subjected to in elementary school. I was taught in public elementary school in Pennsylvania that Abe was so honest that he once walked six miles to return a penny to a merchant who undercharged him (and six miles back home). He was supposedly so tendered hearted that he cried after witnessing the death of a turkey. He suffered in silence his entire life after witnessing slavery as a teenager (While everyone else in the country was screaming over the issue). And of course he was "a champion of democracy, an apostle of racial equality, and a paragon of social justice," Joseph Fallon writes in his important new, must-read book, Lincoln Uncensored.

This view of Lincoln, writes Fallon, is only true "in official histories or in Hollywood movies" but not in reality. The reason for this historical disconnect is that "this myth of Lincoln, not the Constitution . . . now confers legitimacy on the political system of the United States." Despite being mostly a bundle of lies, it is nevertheless the ideological cornerstone of statism in America and has been for nearly 150 years.

The real Lincoln was a dictator and a tyrant who shredded the Constitution, fiendishly orchestrated the mass murder of hundreds of thousands of fellow citizens, and did it all for the economic benefit of the special interests who funded the Republican Party (and his own political career). But don’t take Joseph Fallon’s or Thomas DiLorenzo’s word for it. Read the words of Abe Lincoln himself. That is what Fallon allows everyone to do in his great work of scholarship, Lincoln Uncensored. No longer do Americans need to rely on politically-correct, heavily state-censored textbooks or movies made by communistic-minded Hollywood hedonists to learn about this part of their own country’s history.

Each of the twenty-three chapters of Lincoln Uncensored explains the real Lincoln in Lincoln’s own words by quoting him directly from The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln (CW), complete with specific citations for every single quotation. The following is an abbreviated sampling of what you will learn upon reading Lincoln Uncensored.


"Free them [blacks] and make them politically and socially our equals? My own feelings will not admit of this . . . . We cannot then make them equals." (CW, Vol. II, p. 256).

"There is a natural disgust in the minds of nearly all white people, to the idea of an indiscriminate amalgamation of the white and black races" (CW, Vol. II, p. 405).

"What I would most desire would be the separation of the white and black races" (CW, Vol. II, p. 521).

"I have no purpose to introduce political and social equality between the white and black races . . . . I, as well as Judge Douglas, am in favor of the race to which I belong, having the superior position. I have never said anything to the contrary." (CW, Vol. III, p. 16).

"I am not, nor ever have been in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races . . . . I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people . . ." (CW, Vol, III, pp. 145-146).

"I will to the very last stand by the law of this state, which forbids the marrying of white people with negroes." (CW, Vol. III, p. 146).

"Senator Douglas remarked . . that . . . this government was made for the white people and not for negroes. Why, in point of mere fact, I think so too." (CW, Vol. II, p. 281).

Until His Dying Day, Lincoln Plotted to Deport all the Black People Out of America

"I have said that the separation of the races is the only perfect preventive of amalgamation . . . . Such separation . . . must be effected by colonization" [to Liberia, Central America, anywhere]. (CW, Vol. II, p. 409).

"Let us be brought to believe it is morally right , and . . . favorable to . . . our interest, to transfer the African to his native clime . . ." (CW, Vol. II, p. 409).

"The place I am thinking about having for a colony [for the deportation of all American blacks] is in Central America. It is nearer to us than Liberia." (CW, Vol. V, pp. 373, 374).


" I think no wise man has perceived, how it [slavery] could be at once eradicated, without producing a greater evil, even to the cause of human liberty himself." (CW, Vol. II, p. 130).

"I meant not to ask for the abolition of slavery in the District of Columbia." (CW, Vol., II, p. 260).

"I believe there is no right, and ought to be no inclination I the people of the free states to enter into the slave states and interfere with the question of slavery at all." (CW, Vol. II, p. 492).

"I have no purpose directly or indirectly to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists." (CW, Vol. III, p. 16).

"I say that we must not interfere with the institution of slavery . . . because the constitution forbids it, and the general welfare does not require us to do so." (CW, Vol. III, p. 460).


"I do not now, nor ever did, stand in favor of the unconditional repeal of the fugitive slave law." (CW, Vol., III., p. 40).

"[T]he people of the Southern states are entitled to a Congressional Fugitive Slave Law." (CW, Vol. III, p. 41).

Lincoln Advocated Secession When it Could Advance His Political Career

"Any people anywhere, being inclined and having the power, have the right to rise up, and shake off the existing government, and form a new one that suits them better." (CW, Vol. 1, p. 438).


"I think we should hold the forts, or retake them, as the case may be, and collect the revenue." (CW, Vol. IV, p. 164).


"The dogmas of the quite past [referring to the U.S. Constitution], are inadequate to the stormy present . . . so we must think anew and act anew." (CW, Vol. V, p. 537).

"The resolutions quote from the constitution, the definition of treason; and also the . . . safeguards and guarantees therein provided for the citizen . . . against the pretensions of arbitrary power . . . . But these provisions of the constitution have no application to the case we have in hand." (CW, Vol. VI, p. 262.

"[T]he theory of the general government being only an agency, whose principles are the states [i.e. the true history of the American founding] was new to me and, as I think, is one of the best arguments for the national supremacy." (CW, Vol. VII, p. 24.

"I felt that measures, otherwise unconstitutional, might become lawful . . ." (CW, Vol. VII, p. 281).

"You [General John Dix] are therefore hereby commanded forth with to arrest and imprison in any fort or military prison in your command the editors, proprietors and publishers of the aforesaid newspapers [New York World and New York Journal of Commerce]." CW, Vol. VII, p. 348.

"It was decided [by Lincoln alone] that we have a case of rebellion, and that the public safety does require the qualified suspension of the writ [of Habeas Corpus]." CW, Vol. IV, pp. 430-431.


"[A] tariff of duties on imported goods . . . is indispensably necessary to the prosperity of the American people." (CW, Vol. I, p. 307.

"[B]y the tariff system . . . the man who contents himself to live upon the products of his own country , pays nothing at all." (CW, Vol. I, p. 311).

"All carrying . . . of articles from the place of their production to a distant place for their consumption . . . is useless labor." (CW, Vol. I, p. 409).

"I was an old Henry Clay tariff whig. In old times I made more speeches on that subject, than on any other. I have not changed my views." (CW, Vol, III, p. 487).

"The tariff is to the government what a meal is to a family . . ." (CW, Vol., IV, p. 211).

"I must confess that I do not understand the subject [the economics of tariffs]." (CW, Vol. IV, p. 211).

"The power confided to me, will be used . . . to collect the duties and imposes; but beyond what may be necessary for these objects, there will be no invasion . . ." (CW, Vol. IV, p. 266).

"Accumulations of the public revenue, lying within [Fort Sumter] had been seized [and denied to the U.S. government] . . . . [The administration] sought only to hold the public places and property [i.e., the forts] . . . to collect the revenue." (CW, Vol. IV, pp. 422-423).


"[I]t is peculiarly fit for us to recognize the hand of God in this terrible visitation [i.e. the war]." CW, Vol. IV, p. 482.

"You all may recollect that in taking up the sword thus forced into my hands this Government . . . placed its whole dependence upon the favor of God." (CW, Vol. V., p. 212).

"God wills this contest [the war]." CW, Vol. V, p. 404.

"If I had my way, this war would never have been commenced . . . but . . . we must believe that He permits it for some wise purpose of his own, mysterious and unknown to us . . ." (CW, Vol. V, p. 478).

"[I]t has not pleased the Almighty to bless us with a return to peace . . ." (CW, Vol. V, p. 518).

"[R]ender the homage due to the Divine Majesty . . . to lead the whole nation, through the paths of repentance and submission to the Divine Will, back to the perfect enjoyment of Union . . ." (CW, Vol. VI, p. 332).

"It has pleased Almighty God . . . to vouchsafe to the army and the navy of the United States victories on land and sea." (CW, Vol. VI, p. 332).

"I claim not to have controlled events, but confess plainly that events have controlled me . . . . God alone can claim it." (CW, Vol. VII, p. 282).

"He intends some great good to follow this mighty convulsion, which no mortal could make . . ." (CW, Vol. VII, p. 535).

Joseph Fallon concludes that "Lincoln was not America’s Messiah. He was America’s Lenin, complete with a party dictatorship, centralized economy, and total war." These are undeniable historical facts. His own words reveal him to be "a demagogue not a democrat, an opportunist not an idealist, and enemy and not a champion of civil rights." This of course is why he has been so deified by totalitarian-minded politicians of all parties, from Thaddeus Stevens to Barack Obama.

Thomas J. DiLorenzo is a professor of economics at Loyola College in Maryland and the author of The Real Lincoln; Lincoln Unmasked: What You’re Not Supposed To Know about Dishonest Abe, How Capitalism Saved America, and Hamilton’s Curse: How Jefferson’s Archenemy Betrayed the American Revolution – And What It Means for America Today. His latest book is Organized Crime: The Unvarnished Truth About Government.

By Al Benson Jr.

According to an article on for June 7th Rush Limbugh has stated that Barack Obama and his administration are leading a “coup d’ etat’ to take over the United States. Limbaugh said this on his radio show on Friday, June 7th. Limbaugh noted the recently-discovered National Security Agency domestic surveillance (spying) programs being carried on against millions of Americans, all in the name of “fighting terrorism.” Of course the supposed “terrorists” that this Marxist administration are fighting are those patriotic Americans that oppose its Marxist agenda. After all, doesn’t opposing any form of Marxism automatically qualify you as a “terrorist?” According to this administration it does.

I can somewhat agree with Limbaugh’s rationale except that his timing is off by 150 years. The real (and ongoing coup) took place in 1861, during the early days of the Lincoln administration. All Obama is trying to do is to mop up the residual resistance that still lingers, and this is what his puppet-masters put him in office for.

Professor Thomas DiLorenzo, in a recent article on  on 6/3 noted that: “He (Lincoln) illegally suspended Habeas Corpus and imprisoned tens of thousands of Northern political critics without due process; shut down over 300 opposition newspapers; committed treason by invading the Southern states (Article 3, Section 3 of the Constitution defines treason as ‘only levying war upon the states’ or ‘giving aid and comfort to their enemies’ which is, of course exactly what Lincoln did). He enforced military conscription with the murder of hundreds of New York City draft protesters in 1863 and with the mass execution of deserters from his army;…confiscated firearms and issued an arrest warrant for the Chief Justice (Roger Taney) when the jurist issued an opinion that only Congress could legally suspend Habeas Corpus…” Lincoln’s coup basically changed the form of government to one where Washington decided everything and the State governments became little more than vassals to an all powerful national government. They kept the forms but ate out the real substance and that was enough to fool most people.

Sounds as if Obama has been taking lessons from “Honest Abe.” No wonder they call him “Honest Abama.” After this coup, Lincoln was duly accorded the position of deity by the Republican Party and both parties have continued to promote that falsehood until this day. The point here is that, no matter what Obama is now doing, Lincoln already did it, in some form or other, and since he got by with it and it has now been legitimized in the “history” books, you have to consider that Abraham Lincoln’s coup was successful. It has never been repudiated or reversed. Indeed, it has been affirmed. Indeed, with their wholehearted Lincoln worship, Limbaugh and many other patriotic types have routinely affirmed it and continue to do do.

In the early 1900s Lincoln’s “the federal government should control it all” attitude was picked up by groups like the Council on Foreign Relations, which, since its inception, has labored to make darn sure the federal government controlled it all and that they controlled the federal government.

If you want to do a little research sometime, check out how many CFR members have been in most presidential cabinets since Woodrow Wilson, or how many have been in the armed forces, or the media, or the “educational” field. Their numbers will shock you. These are the One World government boys, the ones that put Obama in office and handed him his agenda (which really is not all that much different than Lincoln’s was).
I can sympathize with Limbaugh’s opposition to what Obama is doing. Honest folks should oppose it, but because most of them do not know or understand accurate history what they end up doing is opposing what Obama is now doing while endorsing the same policies when Lincoln practiced them.

James 1:8 in the New Testament states that: “A double minded man is unstable in all his ways.” That’s a lot of our problem today—it’s bad if Obama does it but just fine if Lincoln did it. The coup actually took place 150 years ago—and we don’t know the difference. May God help us!

by: Kevin Carroll

The people of America decided their next President through January of 2017. The selection process is nasty and full of deceptions, gravitas and righteousness. In reality, neither candidate has the ability or desire to correct the inherent defects that exist in both monetary  and fiscal policy. 

The Federal Reserve authorizes the printing of endless fiat currencies without any supervision of government. The bank controls the government. The government, desperate for growth, strides to collect more revenue (taxes) in order to  perpetuate it own self. The Fed is the spigot filling up  the tub with money and the  IRS is the drain sucking it all out. They work well together. The politicians of both parties are in on the game and play musical chairs trading off power within the kabuki dance of  an admiring and complicit media.   

Now if one were to take a look at the  electoral map, it would find that the old Southern Confederacy today controls only 200 votes if Maryland is included (she has 10). Obviously, no one would  consider Maryland a  ”red” State. If adding to the Southern States the Western States were added which comprise 53 votes (Arizona at 11) the “confederacy” of those  two regions would not exceed 253 short of  the required 270 to win. In that event some party would have to secure either Ohio or a combination of Wisconsin and Indiana in order to win the election.

The vote for political direction in America has seldom changed since  1865. Northeastern States supported by the left coast has- and  always will -select the President. The South and West are placated to, but do not have much more than tie breaking ability. The lives and  fate of these constituencies are typically determined by others whose values and lifestyles are quite opposite. 

America today is red states and blue states. Once the word state was State. There was a time when we were a united States and not the current United States. We were a union of States now we are a Union of states. The emphasis on a  document’s capitalization has consequences and students that should learn the basics of  governmental formation. They won't learn that we were constructed and founded as a nation of  all States as opposed to a Nation of one State. The differences are subtle to many but impossible to others. The  difference, if even realized, is the seed which allows liberty to prosper, spirituality to flourish and righteousness to  govern.  

The real deception is  in believing that victory of either party will modify the collision coarse America is on  with disaster. Washington based politicians, which are  power mongering fools,  are sin-ominous with evil as they all spin webs of deceit to convince simple minded people of the "righteousness" of their nefarious purposes. They wave the shiny object to distract Americans while behind the curtain they roll out ways and methods of subverting Liberty at the cost of security (that is another article in an of itself).

The red States of the South and West can never control their own destiny as long as the current system prevails. The Constitution was to provide for Liberty at the human level, a gift from almighty God, yet Government now controls how those red States shall be forever governed and what form that Liberty shall be allowed. 

Editor's note: It fills the Confederate cause with a great sadness to know we have lost one of our own. Tommy (PoP) Aaron was always supportive and graceful in his advice to our Confederate Society. He posted some of our comments and essays on his own site. The Demastus blog and email is the quintessential trading post for all hearts who are Confederate in the cause.His noble undertaking has given rise to the patriot flaggers who keep the memory of fallen brothers alive and do more to advance the word of Confederate than any organization- including this Society. Our sorrow is only overcome by the knowledge that he has passed unto our Lord and in doing so can proudly boast what few can; that he  gave for his Confederate Country like few have ever done in their days. God bless you our brother and may your soul rest eternal.  From your fellow brothers at the Confederate Society. 

From our brethren at PoP's Southern American....

It is with sadness to learn of the passing of Tommy "PoP" Aaron.  He was an example of a die-hard and faithful Southern patriot; a Southern American, as he preferred to be called.  PoP was a humble man and shunned calling attention to himself.  His good works, enthusiasm and pleasant personality drew his friends to him for advice and camaraderie. His enemies are those who work against the things PoP loved so much.  He endeared himself to the Confederate community with numerous web sites and blogs.  His Christian demeanor was never  called into question, as he was quick to praise his Lord.  He was stern, but gentlemanly-strong,and never overbearing.  His dedication to Tennessee Confederate Flaggers  allowed a voice be given to the Confederate veterans who have been maligned by slander.  He welcomed debate, but in keeping with his character, demanded it be clean with documented facts only.  He spent over forty years “fighting those people”, as he referred to those who tarnished the legacy of the men who fought for our beloved South.  The man from East Ridge, Tennessee has done his duty to his God and to the Southland.  May we follow his example.

Dear Patriots (thousands bcc herein w/permission to forward),

NOTE to Spy Police:

If y’all are reading this communique as opposed to “Just Scanning Things”, as YOUR ‘president’ claims, please understand that this is a rhetorical question of NO importance to YOUR ‘National Security’.

Therefore, if YOU are reading it as opposed to ‘Just Scanning’, understand that I, therefore, both as an American & Confederate Citizen get to choose, the

‘Cheeks YOU Can Kiss”.
And remember, I have TWO SETS!

Now to my message and the IMPORTANCE of its Question:

  Be it known that I do NOT take the Subject Question lightly as I had many friends who died in those Twin Towers, one of whom was my Cousin.

  If the culmination of that Horrific Event is the Subjugation of OUR Liberties, driven by the ambiguous and always changing interpretation within Bush’s’ Patriot Act, and the subsequent creation of additional ‘Federal/National’ Government departments whose combined ‘responsibility’ is to protect us through the Obfuscation of OUR Liberties, then:

WHO in fact Really Won and WHO in fact Really LOST?

  The TWIN PARTIES of this Governmental DUOPOLY are quick to accuse one another of ‘political malfeasance’ BUT EACH draw upon the OTHER’S LAWS to effect & advance a


  And what is the result of that GOOD?

  Political Corruption and the advanced intrusion and LOSS of our Freedom’s in the Name of our Protection!

  The American People are being used as a ‘ScapeBoard’ to alter the dominion of this Dwindling Republic much the same as other Peoples of other Nations have been used in the past and for the SAME IDENTICAL REASONS-

To ADVANCE a Political Ideology of a FEW using the MASSES in which to accomplish THEIR Nefarious Means to THEIR Ends via Divisiveness and a Multi-Tiered Demographics-

using the Ethnicity and Special Interests of EACH and their Individual Positions as a Plankboard to ALTER & DESTROY THE ORIGIN OF THE ORIGINAL.

  America at ONE TIME possessed the Common Sense that was engrained within her-  thanks to the observance and acceptance of the Lord Almighty’s wisdom that was imparted & accepted by us that has been cast out and turned aside thanks to this National Government’s Policy of Divide & Conquer- playing each and every group off of one another resulting in the LOSS of EVERYTHING Intrinsic to the welfare and well-being of ALL - and right under everyone’s noses & eyes.

  This has resulted particularly, over the last 50 years, in various conditions being created & advanced, often under the Guise of “HUMANITARIANISM”, that I believe are NO longer reversible.

  As such, we now have TWO TWAINS of People within this Country of such wide difference thanks to a Political Ideology created by the Washington Machine & the Policies associated with it, that their Ideology has made it Impossible for these ‘Twains’ to  co-exist.


  Therefore, THEY MUST SEPARATE less Calamity and Holocaust overtake them BOTH thanks to the efforts & policies of the Central Entity that is Playing Each of Them off of one another and for NO other reason than to Advance THEIR Miss-Guided Political Malady designed to satisfy their ill-begotten ‘Global Order’ desires.

  Each of YOU is going to have to make a CHOICE and I would declare as a ‘Student of History’ that….THAT CHOICE WILL HAVE TO BE SOON!

  As in any ‘Failed Marriage’, so too is the relationship between the Vast Majority of Americans, this National Government and the Social entities they have deliberately conspired to create.


  Cause & Effect:

 One CANNOT EXPECT THE ‘PROXY’ of one or Two Counties within a State to mandate and dictate the Policy of ALL within that State resulting from and via the Influence of a Created Demographic via ENTITLEMENT.


  Political Corruption.

  REPUBLIC vs. Democracy- and the Cardinal Example of the TWO:

Article ONE, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution essentially speaks to ‘ALL of the ABOVE’ with respect to TAXES & I QUOTE:


“Representatives & direct TAXES shall be APPORTIONED, let me Repeat that- APPORTIONED, among the several States…. “

(This Manifest speaks of the Continuous Language within the first 10 Amendments of the Constitution relative to the REPUBLIC, ET AL!!!!!!!!!!)

  Thus, WHO & WHERE did this ‘Federal/National’ Government EVER GET THE POWER TO TAX EVERYONE the SAME &, Subsequently, TO CREATE AN Authority such as the IRS to Collect & Interpret THEIR TAX STRUCTURE when the CONSTITUTION Clearly States that TAXES were to have been APPORTIONED by the STATES?

Thus the Political Calamity and LIE called WASHINGTON, DC TODAY Revealing an IDEOLOGY of such Political Disconnect!

It was to supposed to have been APPORTIONED- NOT, NOT an across the ‘Boards’ one-size fits all!

Are Y’all Getting It?

And unto this Police Department they call the IRS, they would ‘entrust’ other Powers like YOUR medical Welfare?

Are Y’all Getting It?


Do You NOW Understand what & why John Calhoun asked this in 1831:

“ Are we a Constitutional Government resting solidly on the basis of the Sovereignty of the States,

Or the Un-restrained WILL of a Majority;

A form of Government, as in ALL Other UNLIMITED one’s in which

Injustice, Violence and Force must ultimately prevail.”

Yet WE are being controlled by that STATED ILLEGALITY that Uses the Basis of Its Existence to


Do YOU Now Understand the Basis for the CREATION of OUR ORIGINAL Republic as well as the other One known as,

The Confederate States of America,

And why its Legal Dejure Government that was Never Surrendered MUST BE RESTORED?


Can YOU Equally Appreciate, therefore, this exclaim from PATRICK HENRY’S WISDOM:

“ Guard with Jealous Attention the Public Liberty.

SUSPECT Everyone who approaches that Jewel!

Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force and whenever you give up that force, you are inevitably ruined!”

  Just ‘Connect the Dots’ Folks, just ‘Connect the Dots’- can you understand why Guns are so IMPORTANT to them and why they want to ‘downsize’ the Language of YOUR 2nd Amendment…..

Because it just may come down to the FORCE Patrick Henry has spoken about if these TWAINS do NOT GO THEIR SEPARATE WAYS!

  ‘One SIZE does NOT fit ALL’- The FOUNDERS!

For God, Family and The Republic of the Confederation,

Craig Maus,

President, The Confederate Society of America

Deo Vindice!

Will YOU Join Us Now-?

Dear Patriots (thousands copied herein w/permission to forward),

  There are few times in which the Ideology associated with the perverse Political Oligarchy who Rules this Country reveals itself- but in this, their ‘hour of weakness’, as clearly witnessed in the VIDEO herein, their Mindset & The opinion they have of us is REVEALED in ‘full disclosure’.

  We are obviously considered a Nuisance and not more than a step above the 15th century class known as the Proletariat!  

  What should be EQUALLY apparent, as I have asked this question before and WILL AGAIN-

Does Anyone Truly believe that they believe, that they derive their authority from the consent of the Governed? US?

Clearly, as evidenced herein, many of them do NOT!

  Listen to this Marxist ‘representative’, Jim McDermott, from Washington State reveal himself (Video herein) in which he Castigates the People sitting before him in yesterday’s Congressional Hearings regarding the IRS’s miss-use of Government power whose sanctions and sailing orders, we now know, were known by the White House Chief Council.

  This, and ALL ELSE that has, is & continues to occur, defies any heretofore suggestions that Obama did not KNOW ANYTHING about that which was & has been underway given this his background, statements, associations and relationships with some of the most sinister anti-American characters ever assembled within the same body of Government.

  Yet this group of entrenched Marxists have cajoled the American People over many decades into believing they were somehow responsible for the plight and condition of every miss-begotten group who ever cried FOUL, using the less informed to establish, clearly, Discriminatory Practices that would elevate, advance and solidify their Political Position over us.

  And NOW that their Political Practices of Many Decades are finally catching up with them because they have become too Fat & too Large resulting from a ‘Fast & Furious’ Feeding Frenzy at the expense of this Electorate, resulting in ‘sloppiness’ and getting Caught with one too many of their sticky fingers in one too many Cookie Jars, they would castigate & excoriate the same body of citizens who have paid for their self-indulgence and for NO other reason than to defer from ACCOUNTABILITY resulting in NO ONE KNOWING NOTHING about ANYTHING!

  Listen to what this pariah McDermott had to say resulting in Ryan having to dress him down because he was so OBVIOUS.

  Now that a Vast Majority of this Country’s People are finally awakening to the Reality of this Republic’s condition, THEY DON’T LIKE IT and would create a standard of application that would DENY YOU, simply because of YOUR Political beliefs, those rights to which YOU are entitled but who, willingly, gave these same rights to others without question & over time while looking the other way because these ‘other folks’ were willing accomplices in the Theft and Alteration of the American Republic.


  There are several Video’s herein attached to this one.

  I suggest YOU watch Ryan’s rebuke of McDermott but also, watch and listen to McDermott’s May 30, 2009 speech regarding Obama’s HealthCare Bill.



  This is what has been in the WORKS for Decades.


  Of course, that same and unfortunate Political ‘Picture’s prequel, if you will, was that which we have been telling y’all about entitled- The War for Southern Independence.


  In closing, let me remind and share again with YOU, what that ‘Film Critic’ of old said in 1831:


“Stripped of all its covering, the naked question is whether ours is a Federal (meaning Republic of Sovereigns) or,

Consolidated Government (meaning National/Central);

A Constitutional or Absolute one;

A Government resting solidly on the Basis of the Sovereignty of the States, or the Unrestrained will of a Majority;

A Form of Government, as in All other Unlimited one’s in which…

Injustice, Violence and Force must ultimately prevail.”


And what, by God, is ‘appearing’ Before YOU today- Injustice, Violence & Force thanks to the Unrestrained Will of a Majority!


This analysis was noted & stated by the famous John C. Calhoun


  Now all YOU have to do is ‘Connect the Dots’ between 1831 & 1860 and that which resulted after our Country was Invaded & Destroyed by “Those People” (as General Lee called them) in 1865- YOUR Original Confederation of Sovereigns-


The Constitutional One!


And ALL that has occurred since as evidenced by just one of the many Political maniacs like McDermott who are Ruling, NOT Representing ,YOU today.


By the Eternal, WE MUST SEPARATE & Restore the Original Republic,

Craig Maus,

President, The Confederate Society of America


Deo Vindice!

Will YOU Join Us Now? 
Editors note: The following piece is a verbatim article from the Conservative Magazine. Its purpose here in the Sentry blog is to demonstrate what we have been explaining for the past 21 years. The US political system is (and always has been) a rigged game. Only politicians who are willing to go along with their kabuki dance are allowed to join the gang and if they behave, they can aspire to political power and wealth. In "connecting the dots back to 1865" it was necessary to wipe out Confederacy, and the notion that liberty comes from God and not government, in order to lay the foundation for this corrupt structure known as the Council of Foreign relations (as well as its counterparts called the Trilateral Commission and the banksters private company known as the Federal Reverse.)   

"When evil men take office, the whole gang will be in collusion. They will keep the people in utter ignorance and steal their liberty by ambuscade. A standing army we shall have, also to execute the execrable commands of tyranny. Your guns are gone! What resistance could be made? Will you assemble and just tell them? Even if you could assemble, how will you enforce rightful punishment when due? Your guns are gone! My great objection to this government is that it does not leave us the means of defending our rights, or waging war against tyrants. Have we the means of resisting disciplined armies, when our only defense, the militia, is put in the hand of the congress?" Remarks made by Patrick Henry while he was opposing the Constitution when it was unguarded by a Bill of Rights (Courtesy of the Second Amendment Committee).

by: Joe A. Wolverton, II, J.D. who is a correspondent for The New American.

Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky.) is currently on his nationwide“I’m probably running for president” tour. He’s made the requisite stops in the early election states of Iowa and New Hampshire, courting the GOP faithful and bringing the figurative freezers full of red meat to throw their way. Demonstrating impressive political savvy, he’s also making a habit of making bold statements that set him apart from potential Establishment competitors from both sides of the aisle.

He may be making the right rounds, shaking the right hands, and firing at the right targets, but if he’s serious about being elected president, Senator Paul should join the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). At least that is the incredibly bad advice offered by Jacob Heilbrunn to the freshman senator and scion of the libertarian-leaning Paul family.

In an article published on May 19 in The National Interest -- a foreign policy journal — senior editor Heilbrunn suggests not only that Paul “put as much distance between himself” and those who consider the CFR and its globalist policies to be a threat to liberty and U.S. sovereignty, but, “for good measure” he should add CFR president Richard N. Haass as a consigliore.

Here’s Heilbrunn’s pitch:

Nothing would signal that Paul intends to be a serious candidate for the presidency [more] than reaching out to mainstream Republicans such as Haass. Haass is the antithesis of a neoconservative, and it is neocons who, by and large, dominate the GOP, at least when it comes to setting the terms of debate. Whether they wield much influence outside it is a matter of debate. But as one of the avatars of shifting the debate on foreign policy, Paul would do well to broaden his message. Obviously, Paul is not going to abandon his libertarian credo. But it's hardly in conflict with tempering his message for a wider audience. His aim should be to present himself as a mainstream candidate espousing the revival of precepts that were successfully followed by GOP stalwarts such as Dwight Eisenhower, Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford, and George H.W. Bush.

Broaden his message by appealing to the mainstream? That sounds like the none-too-successful strategy of several former GOP presidential contenders.

Beyond shilling for the perpetuation of the same-old-same-old, country club, Establishment partisan politics that have accelerated the decline of this country and its Constitution, Heilbrunn laments that Paul will hew too rigidly to the principles of civil libertarianism that are the essence of his broadening appeal.

And, speaking of that hoary Establishment claque, aren’t they the same group that Senator Paul described as "stale and moss-covered" during a speech at the Conservative Political Action Conference in March?

Undaunted, after extolling Haass’ experience in both Bush (older and younger) administrations, Heilbrunn makes his final appeal to Paul to demonstrate his presidential pragmatism by adopting Haass’ worldview and promoting the CFR’s foreign policy proposals.

Just what is the Council on Foreign Relations? Are they indeed “a secretive organization, the agent of nefarious bankers intent on promoting world government” as Heilbrunn mockingly says “the right” believes them to be?

Or, alternatively, are they, as Heilbrunn claims, a “network of realist thinkers with government experience and serious intellectual attainments”?

In truth, for decades since its creation, the Council on Foreign Relations has been the “mother ship” of the internationalist Establishment and the source of marching orders for the successive State Departments.

Perhaps the best evidence of the influence of this organization was revealed during a speech delivered at CFR headquarters in New York City in 2009, by then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. In her remarks, Clinton offered an accurate and chilling assessment of the relationship between the CFR and American foreign policymakers: “We get a lot of advice from the Council, so this will mean I won't have as far to go to be told what we should be doing and how we should think about the future.”

How prevalent have members of the CFR been in the highest ranks of American politics?

The administrations of every president since Franklin D. Roosevelt have been filled with members of the CFR. From cabinet-level secretaries to the lowest-ranking sub-bureaucrat, presidents have turned to the CFR as the in-house personnel pool.

This path has been faithfully followed by every president — Republican or Democrat — including Barack Obama.

For a full and frightening account of the origin, purposes, and practices of the CFR, readers should turn to James Perloff’s seminal book on the subject, The Shadows of Power: The Council on Foreign Relations and the American Decline. Originally published in 1988, the information provided by Perloff is timeless and timely.

What follows is a brief recitation of Perloff’s account of the inception and influence of the CFR. This synopsis, taken from Perloff's article "Council on Foreign Relations: Influencing American Government" in the August 3, 2009 issue of The New Americanmagazine, should serve as a primer for readers unfamiliar with the group, as well as a warning to Senator Paul to ignore the advice of Jacob Heilbrunn and anyone else who would see him abandon his constitutional conservatism in favor of the staid, secretive, sovereignty-eroding globalism of the Council on Foreign Relations.

Power Behind the Throne

In theory, America’s government is supposed to be “of the people, by the people, for the people.” While this concept rang true in early America, and many individuals still trust in it, the last century has seen the reality of power increasingly shift from the people to an establishment rooted in banking, Wall Street, and powerful multinational corporations. Syndicated columnist Edith Kermit Roosevelt, granddaughter of Teddy Roosevelt, explained:

The word “Establishment” is a general term for the power elite in international finance, business, the professions and government, largely from the northeast, who wield most of the power regardless of who is in the White House. Most people are unaware of the existence of this “legitimate Mafia.” Yet the power of the Establishment makes itself felt from the professor who seeks a foundation grant, to the candidate for a cabinet post or State Department job. It affects the nation’s policies in almost every area.

Roosevelt added that this group’s goal is “a One World Socialist state governed by ‘experts’ like themselves.” 

David Rockefeller, the longtime chairman (and now chairman emeritus) of the CFR, acknowledged the role of the establishment in trying to lead America in the one-world direction in his 2002 book Memoirs:

For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as “internationalists” and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure — one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.

Two major means the establishment employs for controlling government policy: (1) through its influence within the two major parties and the mass media, it can usually assure that both the Republican and Democratic presidential candidates will be its own hand-picked men; (2) by stacking presidential cabinets with CFR members at key positions — especially those involving defense, finance, foreign policy, and national security — it can assure that America will move in the direction it wants.

Since the council’s founding in 1921, 21 secretaries of defense or war, 19 secretaries of the treasury, 17 secretaries of state, and 15 CIA directors have hailed from the Council on Foreign Relations.


Prior to the CFR’s founding, what Congressman Charles Lindbergh, Sr. (the father of the famous aviator) called the “Money Trust” — a cabal of international bankers including the houses of Rockefeller, Morgan, and Rothschild — conspired to create the Federal Reserve System. Their agents, such as Paul Warburg and Benjamin Strong, who had secretly planned the Fed at a nine-day meeting on Jekyll Island, were then put in charge of the system itself. This gave them control of American interest rates, and, by virtue of this, control of the stock market, as well as the capacity to have the U.S. government spend without limit by having the Fed create money from nothing. The result has been decades of inflation and skyrocketing national debt. Not just an accumulation of wealth, but a consolidation of political power was involved.

The Money Trust had backed Woodrow Wilson in the presidential elections, and then controlled him through their front man, Edward Mandell House, who lived in the White House. The trust recognized how the power of government could be used to advance their own interests. 

Wilson, surrounded by the bankers, traveled to the Paris Peace Conference of 1919, which was settling the aftermath of World War I.

His chief proposal there, of course, was the League of Nations — a first step toward world government. However, although the League was established by the Versailles Treaty, the United States did not join because the Senate refused to ratify the treaty. 

In response to this rejection, the bankers’ circle, still in Paris, held a series of meetings and proposed to establish a new organization in the United States, whose purpose would be to lead America into the League. This organization was incorporated in New York City two years later as the Council on Foreign Relations.

Architects of a New World Order

The CFR’s goal was formation of an incrementally stronger world government. Admiral Chester Ward, former Judge Advocate of the U.S. Navy, was a CFR member for 16 years before resigning in disgust. He stated: “The main purpose of the Council on Foreign Relations is promoting the disarmament of U.S. sovereignty and national independence, and submergence into an all-powerful one-world government.” 

After World War II, the League’s successor, the United Nations, was born.

Contrary to what the public is commonly told, the UN was not founded by nations who had tired of war. The UN was conceived by a group of CFR members in the State Department calling themselves the Informal Agenda Group. They drafted the original proposal for the UN, and secured the approval of President Roosevelt, who then made establishing the UN his highest postwar priority. When the UN held its founding meeting in San Francisco in 1945, 47 of the American delegates were CFR members.

Though the UN was not initially set up as a world government, the intent was that it would develop into one over time. John Foster Dulles (CFR), an American delegate to the UN founding meeting who later became Secretary of State under Eisenhower, acknowledged as much in his book War or Peace: “The United Nations represents not a final stage in the development of world order, but only a primitive stage. Therefore its primary task is to create the conditions which will make possible a more highly developed organization.”

Again, Perloff's book The Shadows of Power relates so much more of the destructive effect of CFR influence.

Going forward, one thing is certain, as Perloff wrote in the aforementioned article:

As long as the CFR controls our government, we can anticipate more of the same: diminishing national sovereignty; free flow of immigration (which confuses national identity and weakens national loyalties); increasing jobs losses through multinational trade agreements; further internationalization of law (Law of the Sea Treaty, Kyoto Protocol, World Court, global taxation, etc.); increasing loss of freedoms in a “surveillance society”; progressive organization of the United States, Mexico, and Canada into a North American Union; and ultimately, broader merger into a world government where all power will be concentrated in the hands of the elite.